CA1-8 (AICPA’s Role in Rule-Making) SOLUTION

CA1-8
(AICPA’s Role in Rule-Making) One of the major groups that has been involved in the standardsetting
process is the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Initially, it was the primary organization
that established accounting principles in the United States. Subsequently, it relinquished its power
to the FASB.
Instructions
(a) Identify the two committees of the AICPA that established accounting principles prior to the establishment
of the FASB.
(b) Speculate as to why these two organizations failed. In your answer, identify steps the FASB has
taken to avoid failure.
(c) What is the present role of the AICPA in the rule-making environment?

Solution

(a) One of the committees that the AICPA established prior to the establishment of the FASB

was the Committee on Accounting Procedures (CAP). The CAP, during its existence from 1939 to 1959, issued 51 Accounting Research Bulletins (ARB). In 1959, the AICPA created the Accounting Prin-ciples Board (APB) to replace the CAP. Before being replaced by the FASB, the APB released
31 official pronouncements, called APB Opinions.

(b) Although the ARBs issued by the CAP helped to narrow the range of alternative practices to some extent, the CAP’s problem-by-problem approach failed to provide the well-defined, structured body of accounting principles that was both needed and desired. As a result, the CAP was replaced by the APB.

The APB had more authority and responsibility than did the CAP. Unfortunately, the APB was beleaguered throughout its 14-year existence. It came under fire early, charged with lack of produc­tivity and failing to act promptly to correct alleged accounting abuses. The APB also met a lot of industry and CPA firm opposition and occasional governmental interference when tackling numerous thorny accounting issues. In fear of governmental rule making, the accounting profession investigated the ineffectiveness of the APB and replaced it with the FASB.

Learning from prior experiences, the FASB has several significant differences from the APB. The FASB has: (1) smaller membership, (2) full-time, compensated membership, (3) greater autonomy, (4) increased independence, and (5) broader representation. In addition, the FASB has its own research staff and relies on the expertise of various task force groups formed for various projects. These features form the bases for the expectations of success and support from the public. In addition, the due process taken by the FASB in establishing financial accounting standards gives interested persons ample opportunity to make their views known. Thus, the FASB is responsive to the needs and viewpoints of the entire economic community, not just the public accounting profession.

(c) The AICPA has supplemented the FASB’s efforts in the present standard-setting environment. The issue papers, which are prepared by the Financial Reporting Executive Committee (FinREC) formally the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC), identify current financial reporting problems for specific industries and present alternative treatments of the issue. These papers provide the FASB with an early warning device to insure timely issuance of FASB standards. In situations where the FASB avoids the subject of an issue paper, FinREC may issue a Statement of Position to provide guidance for the reporting issue. FinREC also issues Practice Bulletins which indicate how the AICPA believes a given transaction should be reported.

Recently, the role of the AICPA in standard-setting has diminished. The FASB and the AICPA agreed, that after a transition period, the AICPA and FinREC no longer issues authoritative accounting guidance for public companies.