CA1-9
(FASB Role in Rule-Making) A press release announcing the appointment of the trustees of the new Financial Accounting Foundation stated that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (to be appointed by the trustees) “. . . will become the established authority for setting accounting principles under which corporations report to the shareholders and others” (AICPA news release July 20, 1972).
Instructions
(a) Identify the sponsoring organization of the FASB and the process by which the FASB arrives at a
decision and issues an accounting standard.
(b) Indicate the major types of pronouncements issued by the FASB and the purposes of each of these
pronouncements.
Solution
The Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) help the FASB to
avoid the “problem-by-problem approach.” These statements set forth fundamental
objectives and concepts that the Board will use in developing future standards
of financial accounting and reporting. They are intended to form a cohesive set of interrelated concepts, a body of theory
or a conceptual framework, that will serve as tools for solving existing and
emerging problems in a consistent, sound manner.
(FASB Role in Rule-Making) A press release announcing the appointment of the trustees of the new Financial Accounting Foundation stated that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (to be appointed by the trustees) “. . . will become the established authority for setting accounting principles under which corporations report to the shareholders and others” (AICPA news release July 20, 1972).
Instructions
(a) Identify the sponsoring organization of the FASB and the process by which the FASB arrives at a
decision and issues an accounting standard.
(b) Indicate the major types of pronouncements issued by the FASB and the purposes of each of these
pronouncements.
Solution
(a) The
Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF) is the sponsoring organization of the
FASB. The FAF selects the members of the FASB and its Advisory Council, funds
their activities, and generally oversees the FASB’s activities.
The FASB follows a due process in establishing a typical
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards. The following steps are
usually taken: (1) A topic or project is
identified and placed on the Board’s agenda. (2) A task force of experts from
various sectors is assembled to define problems, issues, and alternatives
related to the topic. (3) Research and analysis are conducted by the FASB
technical staff. (4) A preliminary views document is drafted and released. (5)
A public hearing is often held, usually 60 days after the release of the
preliminary views. (6) The Board analyzes and evaluates the public response.
(7) The Board deliberates on the issues and prepares an exposure draft for
release. (8) After a 30-day (minimum) exposure period for public comment, the
Board evaluates all of the responses received. (9) A committee studies the exposure
draft in relation to the public responses, reevaluates its position, and
revises the draft if necessary. (10) The full Board gives the revised draft
final consideration and votes on issuance of a Standards Statement. The passage
of a new accounting standard in the form of an FASB Statement requires the
support of five of the seven Board members, before it is incorporated in the
codification.
(b) The FASB
issues two major types of pronouncements: Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs)
and Concepts Statements. ASUs issued by the FASB are considered GAAP.
ASU’s may be comprised of major standards projects, EITF
consensus, or interpretations. Regardless of nature, if approved by the FASB in
a ASU, then the guidance is considered GAAP.
In addition, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
issues statements to provide guidance on how to account for new and unusual
financial transactions that have the potential for creating diversity in
reporting practices. The EITF identifies controversial accounting problems as they
arise and determines whether they can be quickly resolved or whether the FASB
should become involved in solving them. In essence, it becomes a “problem
filter” for the FASB. Thus, it is hoped that the FASB will be able to work on
more pervasive long-term problems, while the EITF deals with short-term
emerging issues.
0 Comments